| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wait events monitoring future development |
| Date: | 2016-08-10 14:43:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20160810144347.GC21285@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:37:36PM +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> If people are facing with some difficult situation in terms of performance,
> they may accept some (one-time) overhead to resolve the issue.
> But if they don't have (recognize) any issue, they may not.
>
> That's one of the realities according to my experiences.
Yes. Many people are arguing for specific defaults based on what _they_
would want, not what the average user would want. Sophisticated users
will know about this and turn it on when desired.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-10 14:51:24 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
| Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2016-08-10 14:37:36 | Re: Wait events monitoring future development |