From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com" <ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wait events monitoring future development |
Date: | 2016-08-09 11:45:11 |
Message-ID: | 20160809114511.GJ16416@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 04:17:28AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > I used to think of that this kind of features should be enabled by default,
> > because when I was working at the previous company, I had only few features
> > to understand what is happening inside PostgreSQL by observing production
> > databases. I needed those features enabled in the production databases when
> > I was called.
> >
> > However, now I have another opinion. When we release the next major release
> > saying 10.0 with the wait monitoring, many people will start their benchmark
> > test with a configuration with *the default values*, and if they see some
> > performance decrease, for example around 10%, they will be talking about
> > it as the performance decrease in PostgreSQL 10.0. It means PostgreSQL will
> > be facing difficult reputation.
> >
> > So, I agree with the features should be disabled by default for a while.
>
> I understand your feeling well. This is a difficult decision. Let's hope for trivial overhead.
I think the goal is that some internal tracking can be enabled by
default and some internal or external tool can be turned on and off to
get more fine-grained statistics about the event durations.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-08-09 12:16:55 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-08-09 10:42:33 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |