From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | thomas(dot)berger(at)1und1(dot)de |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
Date: | 2016-07-30 00:26:25 |
Message-ID: | 20160730002625.GB22405@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 08:18:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> However, that is not the end of the story. Things have moved forward
> since 2006 and there is now firm support for either KB or KiB to be
> 1024-based units. This blog post explains the current state of prefix
> specification:
>
> http://pchelp.ricmedia.com/kilobytes-megabytes-gigabytes-terabytes-explained/
>
> and here is a summary for 1000/1024-based units:
>
> Kilobyte (Binary, JEDEC) KB 1024
> Kilobyte (Decimal, Metric) kB 1000
> Kibibyte (Binary, IEC) KiB 1024
Oh, also, here is a Wikipedia article that has a nice chart on the top
right:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix
and a post that explains some of the background:
http://superuser.com/questions/938234/size-of-files-in-windows-os-its-kb-or-kb
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-30 00:37:21 | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-07-30 00:18:38 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-07-30 01:47:33 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-07-30 00:18:38 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() |