Re: Pg-Upgrade standbys via rsync... and avoid sending UNlogged data?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pg-Upgrade standbys via rsync... and avoid sending UNlogged data?
Date: 2016-07-26 16:19:46
Message-ID: 20160726161946.GA3511@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:34:45PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>
> > * Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> >
> >> > I have among others, a 5TB system w/about 40G of unlogged data.
> >>
> >> Honestly, sending an extra 40G out of 5TB (we're talking less than 1%
> >> here...) might be worth it to keep the process simple.
> >
> > Of course, I realize right after sending this that you aren't sending
> > the 5TB. :)
>
> Roger that! Really, the hard link pg-upgrade option and rsync method
> for standbys is pure beauty :-)
>
> We have only the post-analyze and this unlogged data problem to deal
> with.
>
> The warehouse is our only system with any substantial amount of unlogged
> data.
>
> Reducing post-analyze delay was solved by me here with our groovy
> threaded AnalyzMaTron. I can get a >5TB system done in about 45 minutes
> w/20 threads.

The only thing I can suggest is to document this limitation, if people
think it is worth it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2016-07-26 17:22:39 Re: Pg-Upgrade standbys via rsync... and avoid sending UNlogged data?
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2016-07-26 11:55:51 Re: if anyone is running slony, I have a trivial question