From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14228: replication slot catalog_xmin not cleared on slot reuse |
Date: | 2016-07-25 15:25:31 |
Message-ID: | 20160725152531.GY4028@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Gierth
> <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >
> > >> When creating a physical replication slot, the catalog_xmin field of
> > >> the new slot is not initialized. If the slot storage had previously
> > >> been used for a logical slot, the old catalog_xmin will remain in
> > >> place and interfere with vacuum.
> >
> > Michael> Good catch! The same applies to confirmed_flush_lsn, which is
> > Michael> used only by logical decoding and should remain as NULL for
> > Michael> physical slots. So I propose the patch attached to address
> > Michael> both problems.
> >
> > What about slot->effective_catalog_xmin ?
>
> Yes. I guess so, as well as the other candidate_* fields in the slot
> to begin from a clean state.
Seems like we should try to get this in before the next round of point
releases...?
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-25 16:48:34 | Re: BUG #11550: Error messages contain not encodable characters (Latin9) |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2016-07-23 23:47:51 | Re: BUG #7808: unnest doesn't handle nulls in array of composite typescorrectly |