From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pete Stevenson <etep(dot)nosnevets(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: MVCC overheads |
Date: | 2016-07-08 19:44:22 |
Message-ID: | 20160708194422.GA740789@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Has anyone ever done any kind of write-up of the "TED" design that was
> discussed during FOSDEM (I hope I recall the name it was given
> correctly)? Apparently that's something that's been discussed a few
> times among senior community members, and I think it has promise.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/55511D1F.7050902@iki.fi
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-08 19:50:53 | Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2016-07-08 19:21:51 | Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP |