| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | CharSyam <charsyam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Typo Patch |
| Date: | 2016-07-05 19:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20160705192233.GA504891@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
CharSyam wrote:
> Yes, Some typos problems, It is hard to figure them out.
> But in this patch, guranteed is just misspelling of guaranteed.
I agree with Robert: the sentence as a whole makes no sense:
* We need to check all possible distances, so reset Lpos
* to guaranteed not yet satisfied position.
It's hard to justify changing a single character when what we should be
doing is rewriting the comment completely.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-05 19:48:20 | Re: can we optimize STACK_DEPTH_SLOP |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-07-05 19:18:46 | Re: Typo Patch |