From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Haroon (dot)" <contact(dot)mharoon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haroon <muhammad(dot)haroon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |
Date: | 2016-07-01 00:57:32 |
Message-ID: | 20160701005732.GA292354@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 30 June 2016 at 20:19, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, so what about a pure 32bit build, if such a thing still exists? If
> > so and it causes the same crash, perhaps we should have one member for
> > each VS version running on 32bit x86.
>
> It's fine for a pure 32-bit build, i.e. 32-bit tools and 32-bit target. I
> tested that.
Ah, okay. I doubt it's worth setting up buildfarm members testing all
cross-compiles just to try and catch possible compiler bugs that way, so
unless somebody wants to invest more effort in this area, it seems we're
done here.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-07-01 00:58:08 | Re: Is a UDF binary portable across different minor releases and PostgreSQL distributions? |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-07-01 00:48:05 | Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) |