From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reference to UT1 |
Date: | 2016-06-28 17:49:50 |
Message-ID: | 20160628174950.GA23250@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 04:51:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 03:53:41PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The manual[1] says "Technically,PostgreSQL uses UT1 rather than UTC
> > because leap seconds are not handled." I'm certainly no expert on
> > this stuff but it seems to me that we are using POSIX time[2] or Unix
> > time, not UT1.
>
> Based on this report I have removed mentions of UT1 from our docs in the
> attached patch, which I would like to apply to 9.6.
Patch applied. Thanks for the report.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-06-28 18:22:34 | Re: Questionabl description in datatype.sgml |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-06-28 17:43:10 | Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver |