| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_bsd_indent - improvements around offsetof and sizeof |
| Date: | 2016-06-21 19:23:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20160621192351.GB23672@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:22:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:13:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... If we make a change like this, I think we should
> >> *strongly* consider reindenting all the live back branches along with
> >> HEAD.
>
> > Uh, we have been running on back branches anytime the pgindent rules
> > change as part of policy, e.g.:
> > commit 2616a5d300e5bb5a2838d2a065afa3740e08727f
>
> That was not actually a pgindent run, but a one-time application of a very
> limited filter.
Ah, yes, entab -m (only C comment periods).
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-21 19:36:59 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-21 19:22:09 | Re: pg_bsd_indent - improvements around offsetof and sizeof |