From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pg_upgrade and collation |
Date: | 2016-06-20 15:16:36 |
Message-ID: | 20160620151636.GB26992@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:11:58PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Frankly, pg_upgrade is, by definition, upgrading on the same server, so
> > I don't even see how they could have mismatched collation library
> > versions, but it seemed good to document it.
>
> By this argument, the proposed patch seems pointless to me.
>
> > The larger issue of moving clusters is a separate issue that needs
> > documentation somewhere else.
>
> Sure.
In looking at the docs, it seems it would go in the Backup section
somewhere:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/backup.html
Seems it would apply to both of these backup sections:
24.2. File System Level Backup
24.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)
and also here:
25.2. Log-Shipping Standby Servers
It seems odd to put it in all of these places, but where can we
centrally put it?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mschwan | 2016-06-20 16:00:47 | DROP EXTENSION |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-06-20 15:09:34 | Re: pg_rewind option clarification |