| From: | liveloveprosper(at)gmail(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | BUG #14200: Cannot create a table named 'user' |
| Date: | 2016-06-19 02:58:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20160619025854.5798.82044@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 14200
Logged by: Matthew Di Pasquale
Email address: liveloveprosper(at)gmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 9.5.3
Operating system: OS X 10.11.5
Description:
Problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/22256124
Why doesn't the user table have the pg_ prefix or some other prefix?
What if I want to create a user table for my application? Shouldn't I be
able to call that table user?
Would the only reason to use table name prefixes be to avoid this
conflict?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/324163/should-we-use-prefixes-in-our-database-table-naming-conventions#comment61629636_324183
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-06-19 04:01:38 | Re: BUG #14200: Cannot create a table named 'user' |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 15:51:10 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14199: The pg_ctl status check on server start is not compatible with the silent_mode=on |