Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4
Date: 2016-06-17 22:55:17
Message-ID: 20160617225517.GA157662@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Gierth wrote:

> > Why is the correct rule not "check for and ignore pre-upgrade mxids
> > before even trying to fetch members"?
>
> I propose something like the attached patch, which implements that idea.

Here's a backpatch of that to 9.3 and 9.4.

I tested this by creating a 9.2 installation with an out-of-range
multixact, and verified that after upgrading this to 9.3 it fails with
the "apparent wraparound" message in VACUUM. With this patch applied,
it silently removes the multixact.

I will clean this up and push to all branches after the tagging of
9.6beta2 on Monday.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
upgraded-locks-93.patch text/x-diff 10.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-06-18 00:41:54 Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia
Previous Message Aleksey Demakov 2016-06-17 22:55:07 Re: Experimental dynamic memory allocation of postgresql shared memory