Re: Pg_upgrade and collation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg_upgrade and collation
Date: 2016-06-17 22:09:35
Message-ID: 20160617220935.GF19359@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:01:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:51:54PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The attached patch documents that pg_upgrade requires old/new servers to
> > > use compatibile collation library versions as well.
> >
> > I think this is way too thin to be helpful:
>
> Well, this is a much larger issue than pg_upgrade, e.g. moving a data
> directory from one cluster to another with a different collation library
> version could also cause problems, and I don't know that is documented
> at all.
>
> If we want to go larger, we have to do this in a more central location.

Frankly, pg_upgrade is, by definition, upgrading on the same server, so
I don't even see how they could have mismatched collation library
versions, but it seemed good to document it. The larger issue of moving
clusters is a separate issue that needs documentation somewhere else.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-06-17 22:11:58 Re: Pg_upgrade and collation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-06-17 22:03:14 Re: pg_rewind option clarification