Re: Prepared statements and generic plans

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prepared statements and generic plans
Date: 2016-06-14 20:12:46
Message-ID: 20160614201246.GA15349@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:20:12AM -0400, ''bruce(at)momjian(dot)us' *EXTERN*' wrote:
> > This has caused confussion in the past, see
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/561E749D(dot)4090301%40socialserve(dot)com#561E749D(dot)4090301(at)socialserve(dot)com
> >
> > > Right. Updated patch attached.
> >
> > I am happy with the patch as it is.
>
> Good.

Patch applied. Thanks for the assistance.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-06-14 20:24:12 Re: Use of index for 50% column restriction
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-14 20:12:10 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered