From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
Date: | 2016-05-13 16:39:58 |
Message-ID: | 20160513163958.GB29195@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:30:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think you could, though, make an argument that breaking such code
> after beta1 is a bit unfair. People expect to be able to do
> compatibility testing with a new major version starting with beta1.
One could, but I wouldn't find it terribly persuasive. As Thom
pointed out, we have actually done this before.
> More generally, rebranding after beta1 sends a very public signal
> that we're a bunch of losers who couldn't make up our minds in a
> timely fashion. We should have discussed this last month; now I
> think we're stuck with a decision by default.
This, on the other hand, is more persuasive to me. We now have a much
more public face than we did then.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-05-13 16:40:23 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-13 16:35:40 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |