Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 16:28:12
Message-ID: 20160513162812.GC3266@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:12:23AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> There was no disrespect intended. I was trying to push forth an idea that
> multi-company team collaboration is better for the community than single
> company team collaboration. I will stand by that assertion.

Uh, we are already doing that. EDB and NTT are working on FDWs and
sharding, PostgresPro and someone else is working on a transaction
manager, and EDB and 2nd Quadrant worked on parallelism.

What is the problem you are trying to solve?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-05-13 16:30:14 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-05-13 16:24:39 Re: 10.0