| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
| Date: | 2016-05-12 20:24:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20160512202437.GF2632@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:44:17AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > That's basically what the software catalogue does, isn't it? It needs to be
> > revamped to be more user friendly, and more promoted, but as a basis?
>
> Sure, that kind of idea. I'd forgotten we had that. I think that we
> should go to a format with just one line for each piece of software,
> though, instead of a big box. And try to get it all one one page.
> And remove all of the proprietary products or put them in a separate
> section. And include only stuff that's actually reasonably widely
> used.
>
> Maybe we should just go stand up a wiki page to start. What's in the
> software catalog right now looks useless to me.
I think our wiki page that lists all the FDWs is great, so why can't we
do this for other external software?
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-12 20:36:20 | Re: New versioning scheme |
| Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2016-05-12 20:06:55 | Re: New versioning scheme |