Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Date: 2016-05-12 15:13:25
Message-ID: 20160512151325.jwlcwucm7kqfs2kv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2016-05-12 18:09:07 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Please find the test results for the following set of combinations taken at
> 128 client counts:

Thanks.

> *1)* *Unpatched master, default *_flush_after :* TPS = 10925.882396

Could you run this one with a number of different backend_flush_after
settings? I'm suspsecting the primary issue is that the default is too low.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-12 15:27:31 Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-05-12 14:49:06 Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.