Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:36:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 11 May 2016 at 23:16, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2016 12:13 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On 05/11/2016 03:06 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2016 04:25 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> We have a long standing practice of not promoting external
> >>> tools/utilities/add-ons in docs or with releases
> >>
> >> No we don't.  See 092c38a and f02b14f.
> >
> > For those that don't git everyday, is there a link to this?
>
> They're the creation and an update of the last paragraph on this page:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/logfile-maintenance.html
>
> It was added in 2010 by Bruce and updated in 2013 by Peter Eisentraut.
>
>
> Plus also these references to pgAdmin, all present since at least 9.1
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/tutorial-accessdb.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/plpgsql-development-tips.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/external-admin-tools.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/adminpack.html 
>
> "There are several administration tools available for PostgreSQL. The most
> popular is pgAdmin III, and there are several commercially available ones as
> well."

I encourage mentioning external tools in the right context --- we need
more of that. I think the question is whether a beta announcement is
the right place for external tool announcements.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +