| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: release management team statement on patch reverts |
| Date: | 2016-05-11 01:33:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20160511013355.GJ22756@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I also want to reiterate that I didn't immediately call for a revert,
> initially - before recognizing the architectural issue - I offered to
> write code to address the regressions due to the spinlocks.
I was the same case --- I didn't call for the patch to be reverted, but
rather considered for reversion:
"I also strongly question whether we should revert this feature ..."
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2016-05-11 02:08:56 | Re: alter table alter column ... (larger type) ... when there are dependent views |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-11 01:28:11 | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? |