Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions
Date: 2016-05-04 08:59:50
Message-ID: 20160504085950.fe2avrukeshxe3h5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2016-05-04 07:46:42 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >Well, TRUNCATED doesn't entirely work, there's I think some cases where
> >this currently also applies to deleted relations. I kind of like the
> >unintuitive sounding name, because it's really a dangerous options (any
> >further mdnblocks will be wrong).
>
> Hmmm.

I went with the boring DONT_CHECK_SIZE ;)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2016-05-04 10:42:40 Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-05-04 08:59:12 Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-05-04 09:29:12 Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-05-04 08:59:12 Re: what to revert