| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? |
| Date: | 2016-04-29 02:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20160429021220.GA30154@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:07:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
>
> NO. We don't even have a patch for this, much less one that's been
> through any review. This suggestion is at least two months too late.
My larger question was, was 9.6 an ideal time to do this, and if so, why
did this issue not get done. If 9.6 wasn't in some way ideal, we can do
it in 9.7.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-29 02:37:20 | Re: [sqlsmith] Crash in apply_projection_to_path |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-04-29 02:09:07 | Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament |