Re: Timeline following for logical slots

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Date: 2016-04-27 18:29:18
Message-ID: 20160427182918.ytjc5ybuslaw5dad@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-04-27 14:21:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Considering that pg_recvlogical was introduced mostly as a way to test
> > logical decoding features, I think this is a serious oversight and we
> > should patch it. I suppose we could leave it for 9.7, thought I admit I
> > would prefer it to introduce it in 9.6. Now everyone throwing stones at
> > me in 3 ... 2 ...
>
> If that's a small and relatively contained change, I don't object to
> the idea of you making it, provided it's done pretty soon, and
> definitely before beta1. If it's going to require substantial
> refactoring or can't be done quickly, then, yes, I object.

I don't object either, I was looking for the feature myself a number of
times (for tap tests in my case).

It requires a some amount of thinking about what the limit applies to
though. "messages sent by server", Bytes? TCP messages? xids? Time?

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-04-27 18:53:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Modify the isolation tester so that multiple sessions can wait.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-27 18:23:29 Re: pgindent