Re: pgindent

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:51:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think it's about time for us to run pgindent. I did a trial run
> today of pgindent today and came up with the attached patch for
> typedefs.list, which I'd like to commit more or less immediately,
> barring objections. It mostly just adds new typedefs that have
> appeared over the last year, but it also realphabetizes the file -
> some things that were added incrementally seem to have ended up in
> what is, at least according to what sort likes to do on my machine,
> the wrong place in the file.
>
> With this applied, I get a fairly clean pgindent run. There are some
> problems with comments getting mangled, and in a couple of cases
> function definitions getting mangled, that need more investigation.
> I'll try to find time to look into that soon and follow up, unless
> somebody else beats me to it. As far as possible, I think it's
> desirable to clean up those things before rather than after running
> pgindent, because unmangling ASCII art that pgindent has stepped on is
> a thankless chore.

Agreed. Sounds like a good plan --- a better plan than I have used in
the past.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +