From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression test CREATE USER/ROLE usage |
Date: | 2016-04-10 18:21:01 |
Message-ID: | 20160410182100.GY10850@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> broken that way as rowsecurity.sql, which is (still) creating roles
> >> named "alice" and "bob", but it's not acceptable like this.
>
> > Attached is a patch to fix all of the role usage in rowsecurity.sql
> > (I believe, feel free to let me know if there's anything else). In
> > particular, all of the roles are changed to begin with 'regress_', and
> > they are all now created with NOLOGIN.
>
> +1 for the general idea, although there's something to be said for
> using names like 'regress_alice' and 'regress_bob' in this context.
> 'regress_user1' and 'regress_user2' are awfully gray and same-y,
> and therefore a bit error-prone IMO.
Fair enough.
I'll adjust the ending '_userX' to be actual names along the lines of
'alice', 'bob', 'carol', 'dave', 'eve', 'frank', etc.
(List pulled from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob)
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-10 23:08:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-10 17:55:27 | Re: Regression test CREATE USER/ROLE usage |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-04-10 18:27:58 | Re: multivariate statistics v14 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-10 17:55:27 | Re: Regression test CREATE USER/ROLE usage |