From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views vs. primary keys |
Date: | 2016-04-05 23:48:25 |
Message-ID: | 20160405234825.GC8966@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:56PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:50 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > Is there a reason other than lack of tuits for this restriction?
>
> "this" lacks an antecedent.
Try to put a primary key on a materialized view, for example:
CREATE TABLE foo(id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, t text);
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW bar AS SELECT * FROM foo;
REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW bar;
ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW bar ADD PRIMARY KEY(id);
At that last step, you get an error that bar is not a table. You get
an identical error with the hoary old trick of
ALTER TABLE bar ADD PRIMARY KEY(id);
This lack prevents things that depend on primary keys (foreign keys,
logical replication, etc.) from operating on the materialized views.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-04-06 00:05:05 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-04-05 23:26:23 | Re: Unused macros in src/include/access/transam.h |