Re: pgbench more operators & functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench more operators & functions
Date: 2016-04-05 03:47:31
Message-ID: 20160405034731.GA248227@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabien COELHO wrote:

> I try to review all patches in my (small) area of (limited) expertise, which
> is currently pgbench & some part of the checkpointer. I did also minor bug
> fixes (eg isbn). AFAICS none of the patches lacking a reviewer in 9.6 CF
> fall in these area.
>
> Also note that while I submitted patches for the checkpointer, I ended up
> reviewing your version of the patches, so somehow I was first author, then a
> driving force to provoke you to do it your way, and finally a reviewer,
> esp in performance testing which is a time consumming task.

Please note that the checkpointer patch has two open items that perhaps
you can help with --- see https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Open_Items

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-04-05 03:53:53 Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-04-05 03:38:32 Re: snapshot too old, configured by time