| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, thom(at)linux(dot)com, memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
| Date: | 2016-04-05 10:23:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20160405.192305.57944288.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:00:24 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAD21AoDoq1ubY4KkKhrA9jzaVXekwAT7gV5pQJbS+wj98b9-3A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > For this case, the tree members of SyncRepConfig are '2[Sby1,',
> > 'Sby2', "Sby3]'. This syntax is valid for the current
> > specification but will surely get different meaning by the future
> > changes. We should refuse this known-to-be-wrong-in-future syntax
> > from now.
>
> I couldn't get your point but why will the above syntax meaning be
> different from current meaning by future change?
> I thought that another method uses another kind of parentheses.
If the 'another kind of parehtheses' is a pair of brackets, an
application_name 'tokyo[A]', for example, is currently allowed to
occur unquoted in the list but will become disallowed by the
syntax change.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-04-05 10:23:41 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-04-05 10:18:09 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |