From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date: | 2016-04-04 08:59:20 |
Message-ID: | 20160404085920.GA7426@toroid.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2016-04-04 17:28:07 +0900, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Barring any objections, I'll commit this patch.
No objections, just a minor wording tweak:
doc/src/sgml/config.sgml:
"The synchronous standbys will be the standbys that their names appear
early in this list" should be "The synchronous standbys will be those
whose names appear earlier in this list".
doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml:
"The standbys that their names appear early in this list are given
higher priority and will be considered as synchronous" should be "The
standbys whose names appear earlier in the list are given higher
priority and will be considered as synchronous".
"The standbys that their names appear early in the list will be used as
the synchronous standby" should be "The standbys whose names appear
earlier in the list will be used as synchronous standbys".
You may prefer to reword this in some other way, but the current "that
their names appear" wording should be changed.
-- Abhijit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-04-04 09:03:41 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-04 08:58:31 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |