| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
| Date: | 2016-04-04 06:21:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20160404062159.GA2431@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-04-04 06:18:47 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'd say "why not wait?". Minor, non-urgent patches will definitely go
> nowhere for a long time, so it gains nobody to submit now.
>
> Submitting patches during freeze has been discouraged for many years, so
> asking a long term contributor to avoid sending multiple minor patches is
> in line with that.
I don't see much point in asking people to postpone. I do think however
it can make sense to respond with something like:
Fabien, you've been submitting a lot of patches over the last
year. Thanks for the that! To keep up with the amount of incoming work
the prject relies on contributors also shouldering some review
responsibility. Please consider focusing on that, while we're working on
getting 9.6 ready.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-04-04 06:22:22 | Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-04-04 06:19:04 | pgsql: Avoid archiving XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS on idle server |