| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
| Date: | 2016-03-31 02:19:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20160331021915.GA84692@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> Just a note: I began looking at the tests, but finished looking at the
> patch entirely at the end by curiosity. Regarding the integration of
> this patch for 9.6, I think that bumping that to 9.7 would be wiser
> because the patch needs to be re-written largely, and that's never a
> good sign at this point of the development cycle.
Not rewritten surelY? It will need a very large mechanical change to
existing BufferGetPage calls, but to me that doesn't equate "rewriting"
it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-31 02:31:38 | Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2016-03-31 02:00:31 | Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups |