From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
Date: | 2016-03-30 16:01:19 |
Message-ID: | 20160330160119.GA960997@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> page = BufferGetPage(buf);
> + TestForOldSnapshot(scan->xs_snapshot, rel, page);
> This is a sequence repeated many times in this patch, a new routine,
> say BufferGetPageExtended with a uint8 flag, one flag being used to
> test old snapshots would be more adapted. But this would require
> creating a header dependency between the buffer manager and
> SnapshotData.. Or more simply we may want a common code path when
> fetching a page that a backend is going to use to fetch tuples. I am
> afraid of TestForOldSnapshot() being something that could be easily
> forgotten in code paths introduced in future patches...
I said exactly the same thing, and Kevin dismissed it.
I would be worried about your specific proposal though, because it's
easy to just call BufferGetPage() (i.e. the not-extended version) and
forget the old-snapshot protection completely.
I think a safer proposition would be to replace all current
BufferGetPage() calls (there are about 500) by adding the necessary
arguments: buffer, snapshot, rel, and an integer "flags". All this
without adding the feature. Then a subsequent commit would add the
TestForOldSnapshot inside BufferGetPage, *except* when a
BUFFER_NO_SNAPSHOT_TEST flag is passed. That way, new code always get
the snapshot test by default.
I don't like the new header dependency either, though.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-30 16:12:08 | Re: [postgresSQL] [bug] Two or more different types of constraints with same name creates ambiguity while drooping. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-30 16:00:46 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore casts check constraints differently |