| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standby_schedule |
| Date: | 2016-03-30 13:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20160330130445.GA949726@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 29 March 2016 at 22:44, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think we're at a point where we can translate the tests in
> > src/test/regress/standby_schedule file into a PostgresNode-based test,
> > or remove it (probably under src/test/recovery). That way, it would get
> > run all the time rather than just when somebody feels like it (which is
> > probably almost never, if at all).
> >
> > Would somebody like to volunteer?
>
> That was under my maintenance, so I'm happy to do that, as long as its
> after freeze.
That works for me -- this is not a "feature" as such.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jose Luis Tallon | 2016-03-30 13:13:13 | Re: WIP: Access method extendability |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-03-30 13:03:41 | Re: improving GROUP BY estimation |