From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
Date: | 2016-03-29 01:36:15 |
Message-ID: | 20160329013614.GH10850@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> >> v40 is yet another rebase.
> >
> > Thanks. Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the
> > coerceToXXX() functions.
> >
> > I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which
> > removes the historical \setrandom syntax. That's technically no
> > longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly
> > inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward
> > compatibility.
> >
> > Anybody have an opinion on that?
>
> +1 for nuking it. That's not worth the trouble maintaining it.
If we don't nuke it, it'll never die.
See also: pg_shadow
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-03-29 01:36:23 | Re: Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-29 01:31:23 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |