From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | ivan(at)adicional(dot)com(dot)br, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: problem in sql - sum() |
Date: | 2016-03-22 21:07:56 |
Message-ID: | 20160322210756.GA518456@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
David G. Johnston wrote:
> The OP claims that the corresponding rows don't match but I personally have
> not excluded user error - specifically that my assumption (above) of what
> is being compared matches that which is actually being compared.
>
> I'm also not that inclined to debug 9.0.8 when the entire 9.0 release is
> out of support and there are 13 point releases - any of which might have
> been required to fix a bug that exhibits this behavior.
I misspoke. My intention here was to point out that this is most likely
user error, not a software bug, despite how obsolete the version. Yes,
he needs to upgrade, but I cannot honestly believe that upgrading would
"solve" this particular problem.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-22 21:09:52 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-03-22 21:00:46 | Re: problem in sql - sum() |