From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
Date: | 2016-03-18 17:53:36 |
Message-ID: | 20160318175336.ckwjp3n63fufms5v@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-03-18 05:56:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> 0 at the top of the loop and skip it forthwith if so.
> >
> > You mean in WaitEventSetWait()? There's
> > else if (rc == 0)
> > {
> > break;
> > }
> > which is the timeout case. There should never be any other case of
> > returning 0 elements?
>
> No, I meant if (cur_event->events == 0) continue;
I'm not following. Why would there be an event without an empty event
mask? Ok, you can disable all notifications for a socket using
ModifyWaitEvent(), but that's not particularly common, right? At least
for epoll, it'd not play a role anyway, since epoll_wait() will actually
return pointers to the elements we're waiting on; for windows we get the
offset in ->handles. I guess we could do so in the select/poll case,
but adding another if for something infrequent doesn't strike me as a
great benefit.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-18 17:54:59 | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
Previous Message | Dmitry Ivanov | 2016-03-18 17:40:16 | Re: [WIP] speeding up GIN build with parallel workers |