| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | david(at)pgmasters(dot)net |
| Cc: | simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Identifying a message in emit_log_hook. |
| Date: | 2016-03-15 03:22:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20160315.122205.08265186.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thnak you for scooping up this.
At Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:14:09 -0500, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote in <56E17321(dot)5050201(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 3/10/16 7:26 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > Can you add this to the CF? It was submitted before deadline.
> > I presume you have access to do that?
>
> No problem - here it is:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/576/
Some kind of hash code can be added for shotrcut, but this is
usable even after it is added.
One arguable point I see now on this is only ids for the message
type "message" would be enough, or needed for some other types
such as "details". This is quite straightforward so I see no
other arguable point other than the code itself.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-15 03:43:04 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Covering + unique indexes. |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2016-03-15 03:14:51 | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |