Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Date: 2016-03-11 23:29:22
Message-ID: 20160311232922.lygabktknkuqxpnj@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-03-10 23:38:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Would you rather add back the exports or should I?
>
> I'll do it ... just send me the list.

After exporting make_agg, make_limit, make_sort_from_sortclauses and
making some trivial adjustments due to the pull_var_clause changes
change, Citus' tests pass on 9.6, bar some noise. Pathification made
some plans switch from hash-agg to sort-agg, and the other way round;
but that's obviously ok.

Thanks,

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-11 23:31:13 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Provide much better wait information in pg_stat_activity.
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-11 23:24:33 Re: Background Processes and reporting