| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Odd warning from pg_dump |
| Date: | 2016-03-08 15:57:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20160308155729.GO3127@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "any" appears to be invalid
>
> > This is fixed in my changes to pg_dump, though I didn't expect you'd be
> > able to hit them in released versions and so hadn't been planning to
> > break it out.
>
> Oh, this was with HEAD; I've not checked it in released versions.
Using your "-n '*'", I suspect you'd be able to hit it in released
versions also.
I think the real question is if "-n '*'" should still exclude
'pg_catalog'. Fixing the issue with defined pseudo types is wonderful,
but aren't you going to end up with a dump you can't restore,
regardless?
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-03-08 15:58:07 | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-08 15:57:01 | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |