Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Confusing with commit time usage in logical decoding
Date: 2016-03-01 16:57:55
Message-ID: 20160301165755.GA356079@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Artur Zakirov wrote:
> Hello, Andres
>
> You have introduced a large replication progress tracking infrastructure
> last year. And there is a problem described at the link in the quote below.
>
> Attached patch fix this issue. Is this patch correct? I will be grateful if
> it is and if it will be committed.

AFAICS this is clearly a bug introduced in 5aa235042:

/* replay actions of all transaction + subtransactions in order */
ReorderBufferCommit(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr, buf->endptr,
- parsed->xact_time);
+ commit_time, origin_id, origin_lsn);
}

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2016-03-01 17:07:24 Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2016-03-01 16:55:12 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.