| From: | "Constantin S(dot) Pan" <kvapen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP] speeding up GIN build with parallel workers |
| Date: | 2016-02-17 21:46:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20160218004604.23144093@thought |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was testing with number of workers starting at 0. The 0 case is (in
theory) equivalent to master branch. But I should certainly compare to
the master branch, you are right. Will do that shortly.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:26:05 -0800
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Constantin S. Pan <kvapen(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > 4. Hit the 8x speedup limit. Made some analysis of the reasons (see
> > the attached plot or the data file).
>
> Did you actually compare this to the master branch? I wouldn't like to
> assume that the one worker case was equivalent. Obviously that's the
> really interesting baseline.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-02-17 21:46:31 | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-02-17 21:38:22 | Re: Figures in docs |