From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Defaults for replication/backup |
Date: | 2016-02-13 13:39:47 |
Message-ID: | 20160213133947.GB29473@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-02-13 22:37:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > So, I suggest the following changes to the defaults:
> > wal_level=hot_standby
> > max_wal_senders=10
> > max_replication_slots=10
+1. I'm inclined to set slots a bit higher than senders. They're pretty
cheap...
I think this is way past due.
> 10 seems a bit high. I would think that max_wal_senders and
> max_replication_slots set at 3 are sufficient enough, giving enough
> room for simple deployments willing to use replication.
But they're relatively cheap to enable, so why set them low?
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2016-02-13 13:41:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-02-13 13:37:33 | Re: Defaults for replication/backup |