Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook
Date: 2016-02-08 20:47:05
Message-ID: 20160208204705.GA326085@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 10:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think a design that was actually somewhat robust would require two
> > hooks, one at check_role and one at assign_role, wherein the first one
> > would do any potentially-failing work and package all required info into
> > a blob that could be passed through to the assign hook.
>
> Fair enough -- will rework the patch and example code.

Returned with feedback. Thanks.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2016-02-08 20:50:19 Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-02-08 20:45:28 Re: Tracing down buildfarm "postmaster does not shut down" failures