Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Date: 2016-02-08 19:28:57
Message-ID: 20160208192857.GA316589@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've closed this as returned-with-feedback. Please resubmit once you
have found answers to the questions posed; from the submitted benchmark
numbers this looks very exciting, but it needs a bit more work. You
don't necessarily have to agree with everything Robert says, but you
need to have well reasoned explanations for the points where you
disagree.

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-08 19:31:36 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-02-08 19:24:13 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes