Re: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?
Date: 2016-02-04 11:05:32
Message-ID: 20160204110532.GG22591@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:

>> REINDEX [ ( { VERBOSE } [, ...] ) ] { INDEX | TABLE | SCHEMA | DATABASE | SYSTEM } name
...
>> Does this constitute a bug in the documentation or in the Debian version of PG ?
>
> Neither. It's a little bit obscure because {} and [] mean special
> things, but () doesn't.

Eagle-eyed !

> The syntax is therefore:
>
> REINDEX (VERBOSE) DATABASE gnumed_v21;

Thank you ! :-)

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heine Ferreira 2016-02-04 11:48:37 workarounds for ci_text
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2016-02-04 11:00:45 Re: [GENERAL] Q: documentation bug ?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-04 16:01:19 Re: [GENERAL] Q: documentation bug ?
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2016-02-04 11:00:45 Re: [GENERAL] Q: documentation bug ?