| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport |
| Date: | 2016-02-02 22:52:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20160202225242.GA157701@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> The eventual committer is likely to be much happier with this patch if
> you guys have achieved consensus among yourselves on the best
> approach.
>
> (Disclaimer: The eventual committer won't be me. I'm not a Python
> guy. But we try to proceed by consensus rather than committer-dictat
> around here, when we can. Obviously the committer has the final say
> at some level, but it's better if that power doesn't need to be
> exercised too often.)
Actually I imagine that if there's no agreement between author and first
reviewer, there might not *be* a committer in the first place. Perhaps
try to get someone else to think about it and make a decision. It is
possible that some other committer is able to decide by themselves but I
wouldn't count on it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-02-02 22:57:23 | Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-02 22:33:20 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |