| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 17:54:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20160125175420.GD25778@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though. The
> bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been
> bouncing for many commitfests now. Here's a list of the patches with
> the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
> state):
> * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/
> checkpoint continuous flushing
FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last
weeks. After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal
writer, thins are looking good. I plan to post an updated version soon.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-25 17:56:57 | Re: Set search_path + server-prepared statements = cached plan must not change result type |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-25 17:52:38 | Re: is there a deep unyielding reason to limit U&'' literals to ASCII? |