| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |
| Date: | 2016-01-22 21:59:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20160122215928.GA442150@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> (Replying to the digest post)
>
> Having watched this discussion from the start, I think the project
> would be better off without any CoC. The list has always been
> conducted well and if something isn't broken you shouldn't try to fix
> it.
FWIW, I agree that we don't need a CoC.
However, those of us who have never been attacked/abused would naturally
state that there have never been any attacks/abuses, and I believe
that's false -- in other words I believe some people would consider
themselves to have been attacked/abused, even if some external observers
might not necessarily agree that they were being attacked/abused.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2016-01-22 22:02:23 | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2016-01-22 21:52:32 | Re: Let's Do the CoC Right |