| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Releasing in September |
| Date: | 2016-01-20 17:53:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20160120175305.GG26711@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-01-20 09:48:24 -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> There will always be patches desirable-enough that they will be reviewed whether or not the submitter reviewed other patches.
I think that's actually getting less and less true. By now the really
desirable-enough features imply so much work by reviewer and committers,
over a prolonged time, that they're imo unlikely to be picked up just
because they're desirable, even when the author doesn't play by the
rules. I don't think an exceptional case or two is particularly
important.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-20 17:55:41 | Re: Releasing in September |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-20 17:51:07 | Re: Releasing in September |